Markets.com Review 2026: WikiFX Rating, License Status, Complaints, and Risk Signals
Is markets.com safe? A review of its WikiFX rating, CySEC license, unverified records, and user complaints about deposits and withdrawals.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:ACY Securities review 2026: WikiFX score 7.44/10, ASIC and FSCA licenses, 157 user complaints, withdrawal delays, and pricing-related dispute reports.

ACY Securities is a regulated broker with a broad product range, multiple account types, and support for MT4, MT5, and its own LogixTrader platform. On the surface, the profile looks stronger than many offshore-only brokers. But the picture is not one-sided. Its current WikiFX page also shows a lowered score due to unresolved complaints, and the complaint section is large enough that it cannot be treated as a minor detail.
The full broker page is here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/0361950064.html
The broker page describes ACY Securities as an Australia-based broker operating for 10–15 years. It offers access to forex, commodities, indices, cryptocurrencies, ETFs, shares, precious metals, and futures. The profile shows demo accounts, leverage of up to 1:5000, spreads from 0.0 pips, and a minimum deposit of $50. Supported platforms include LogixTrader, MT4, and MT5. Customer contact channels include phone, email, live chat, and multiple social media accounts.

Commercially, that is a strong offer on paper. The leverage is high, the platform support is broad, and the deposit threshold is low enough to appeal to retail traders. But the complaint pattern is what changes the tone of the review.
According to its WikiFX profile, ACY Securities currently has a score of 7.44/10. The rating breakdown shown on the page includes Regulation 8.22, License 8.22, Business 8.00, Software 9.81, and Risk Control 0.00. The same page states that the brokers WikiFX score has been lowered because of a high volume of unresolved client complaints.

That creates a mixed profile. The regulation, license, and software side look relatively strong. The weakest point is risk control, and the complaint burden is visible enough that it affects the overall score.
The strongest part of ACY Securities profile is its regulation.
WikiFX shows the broker as regulated in Australia under an ASIC Market Making License, held by ACY Securities Pty Ltd, license number 403863. It also shows a South Africa FSCA Derivatives Trading License held by ACY SECURITIES SA (PTY) LTD, license number 51008.


For any discussion of ACY Securities license, this is the core positive side of the brokers profile. The broker is not being presented as unlicensed, and the regulatory structure is more substantial than what appears in many weaker brokerage profiles.
WikiFX also carried out an on-site inspection of ACYs Australian address. According to the survey report, the inspection team visited the location in Chatswood, found the office building, confirmed ACY signage, entered the office area, and concluded that the actual location was consistent with the regulatory information.

This is one of the clearer positives in the profile. Unlike some brokers whose field surveys end without confirming a physical office, ACYs Australia office presence was verified in the visit report.
The biggest pressure point in this ACY Securities review is the complaint section.
WikiFXs current risk alert says it has recorded 157 user complaints against the broker. Looking through the complaint feed on the broker page, the issues are not all identical, but two themes appear repeatedly: withdrawal problems and pricing-related disputes that users say caused unfair losses or liquidation.
One complaint says a withdrawal was marked as approved, but the funds did not reach the bank account even after several days. The user described the status on the dashboard as completed or approved while the money itself had not arrived, and said support had not resolved the issue. Another complaint described a pricing dispute in gold trading, claiming ACYs XAU/USD price sharply diverged from wider market levels and resulted in a forced liquidation with a reported loss of around $8,940. Both complaints were posted as exposure cases on the broker page.


The broader complaint feed includes additional posts alleging withdrawal obstruction, delayed payments, rejected payout requests, and unexpected pricing or fee treatment. No single complaint should be treated as a final ruling by itself. But once the complaint volume becomes this large, it becomes part of the brokers profile rather than background noise.
More user exposure reports can be viewed on the broker page here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/0361950064.html
ACY Securities is not a no-license broker. Its ASIC and FSCA records are real strengths, and the verified Australia office visit supports the idea that the business has a physical operating presence. Its product list, platform support, and market visibility also place it above many smaller names.
But the profile is not clean. The same WikiFX page that shows those strengths also shows a lowered score due to unresolved complaints, a risk-control score of 0.00, and a very large complaint count. For that reason, the broker does not fit neatly into a fully reassuring category.
A fair ACY Securities review has to keep both sides in view.
On one side, ACY Securities has a real regulatory framework, a verified Australia office visit, broad market coverage, and mainstream platform support. On the other side, the complaint burden is too large to dismiss, and the main complaint themes — delayed withdrawals and pricing disputes — go directly to the issues traders care about most.
That leaves a balanced conclusion: ACY Securities has stronger licensing and business structure than many weaker brokers, but its complaint profile remains a serious point of caution. Before funding an account, the entity being used, the withdrawal process, and the most recent exposure reports all deserve close review.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Is markets.com safe? A review of its WikiFX rating, CySEC license, unverified records, and user complaints about deposits and withdrawals.

NSFX review 2026: WikiFX score 1.75/10, no valid forex license, revoked FCA status, former Malta license, user complaints, and no office found in WikiFX field survey.

SOUQ CAPITAL presents itself as a regulated multi-asset broker, but its profile, regulatory warning, and licence claims point to a much higher level of risk than the branding suggests.

Spread Co review 2026: FCA license, WikiFX score 6.88/10, user complaints about withdrawals and taxes, unconfirmed office visit, and Indonesia blocking record.